Skip to content
AI Assistants / GA Applications

AI assistants / Business systems

Use AI to prepare the next view or draft, not to hide the operating record.

AI-enhanced CRM and dashboards can summarise authorised activity, classify incoming information, draft notes or explain a metric in context. GA Applications places these capabilities beside the underlying records, citations and approval controls so users can verify the output. Deterministic calculations and authoritative data remain separate from generated interpretation.

Bounded requestWhy did the service queue change this week?
RequestRetrieveDraftReview
Draft with evidence

The assistant has prepared a response, but it is not an approved decision.

1CRM report / authoritative recordsapproved source
2Dashboard definition / reviewed metriccheck currency
Pending review. No external action is available in this demonstration.
Approved sourcesVisible evidenceRole permissionsHuman reviewEvaluationDisable path

Useful because the job is bounded. Trustworthy because the boundaries are visible.

AI assistance belongs inside a designed operating process. It does not replace accountable people, authoritative records or competent professional judgement.

01 / SOURCES

Know what it may use

Approved collections, currency, ownership and access are designed before the interface.

02 / EVIDENCE

Let people inspect support

Citations, source context and uncertainty travel with the draft.

03 / AUTHORITY

Keep decisions attributable

Permissions, review, escalation, logging and shutdown routes match consequence.

01

Choose assistance that reduces reading or preparation effort.

Suitable tasks include summarising a known record set, proposing categories, drafting follow-up or explaining documented measures.

CONTROL 1.1

CRM

Prepare an activity summary or next-action draft from permitted records.

CONTROL 1.2

Dashboard

Explain a change using defined metrics and linked source data.

02

Keep generated interpretation beside its evidence.

Users can inspect source records, see time boundaries, edit the draft and report a problem without mistaking it for stored fact.

CONTROL 2.1

Citation

Link claims to records or metric definitions.

CONTROL 2.2

Label

Distinguish generated summary, approved note and calculated value.

03

Require confirmation before writing or sending.

The system can prepare a CRM note, task, message or narrative, then show its destination and effect to an authorised reviewer.

CONTROL 3.1

Preview

Display recipients, fields and linked records.

CONTROL 3.2

Commit

Record approver, time and final content after confirmation.

04

Apply source permissions and avoid sensitive inference.

Retrieval follows the current user's access; models are not asked to infer protected or irrelevant attributes from customer or worker data.

CONTROL 4.1

Scope

Limit records, time window and fields to the task.

CONTROL 4.2

Testing

Check fabrication, leakage, bias, outdated context and prompt injection.

05

Evaluate against the existing manual decision.

We compare usefulness, support, correction effort and failure behaviour on representative synthetic or approved records before live integration.

CONTROL 5.1

Baseline

Document how the task is completed and checked now.

CONTROL 5.2

Pilot

Begin read-only or draft-only before allowing approved writes.

Questions worth answering

What teams ask before they commit.

Will AI calculate our dashboard numbers?
Core calculations should remain deterministic and documented. AI may explain or summarise approved measures but should not replace the source calculation with an opaque answer.
Can AI write directly into the CRM?
Draft-only is the safer starting point. Approved low-risk writes may follow after evaluation, with destination, audit history and rollback designed.

Add assistance beside the record

Choose one CRM or reporting task to test.

We can design a draft-only pilot with source visibility, evaluation and human confirmation.