Defined scope
Best when the deliverables, inputs, boundaries and acceptance conditions can be described with confidence. The proposal states what is included and how change will be handled.
Commercial clarity before commitment
GA Applications prices work from an agreed scope, delivery pathway and set of responsibilities. The estimate depends on what must be researched, designed, written, built, connected, migrated, tested and supported. Any amount, payment arrangement or ongoing cost becomes binding only when it appears in an accepted written proposal or agreement.
Best when the deliverables, inputs, boundaries and acceptance conditions can be described with confidence. The proposal states what is included and how change will be handled.
Best when the deliverables, inputs, boundaries and acceptance conditions can be described with confidence. The proposal states what is included and how change will be handled.
Useful when the target is clear but important content, data, integrations or technical constraints must be investigated before the complete build can be responsibly priced.
Suitable for an agreed programme of maintenance, content, optimisation or iterative development. The written arrangement defines priorities, capacity, exclusions and how new work is authorised.
Known journeys and acceptance conditions require less contingency than unresolved requirements or competing decision paths.
The volume, condition and ownership of copy, photography, records, local research and approvals affect both production and review.
A shared component system, custom interaction, animation, illustration or immersive experience each carries a different design and testing load.
Integrations, imports, permissions, data quality, error handling and audit needs can be more significant than the number of screens.
Existing URLs, search visibility, content, accounts and operational dependencies may need controlled transition rather than simple replacement.
Accessibility depth, security review, environments, documentation, training and post-launch arrangements are scoped according to risk and need.
Audience journeys, content structure, visual system, responsive components, search migration, forms and connected follow-up.
Record model, process states, permissions, imports, notifications, reporting and adoption by the people using it.
Data availability, definitions, cleaning, refresh behaviour, role views, exceptions and accessible reporting alternatives.
Triggers, rules, failure states, overrides, connectivity, evidence, device context and specialist responsibilities.
Approved sources, permissions, retrieval, review, logging, failure handling and clear boundaries on actions.
There is no universal inclusion list across every project. The accepted proposal should identify deliverables, review rounds or gates, implementation, testing and handover relevant to that scope. Optional work should be recognisable before it is approved.
Specified research, information architecture, representative design, agreed build, content treatment, QA and handover outputs.
Extended content production, original photography, complex migration, new integrations, extra environments, advanced animation, training or ongoing optimisation.
Unlisted specialist advice, licences, hardware, third-party work, unlimited revisions or ongoing operation should not be assumed.
Hosting, domains, software subscriptions, payment providers, messaging, maps, stock assets, fonts, data services, hardware and specialist providers can carry separate terms or usage charges. Where relevant, the proposal should state whether an item is client-owned, passed through, estimated or paid directly to the supplier.
Record whose account holds the service and who controls access, billing and renewal.
Identify costs affected by traffic, storage, messages, users, transactions, usage or currency.
State what website or workflow behaviour depends on that supplier remaining available and compatible.
Explain what should become easier, for whom and why it matters now.
Share relevant pages, tools, spreadsheets, data, workflows and known constraints.
Decide whether enough is known for a defined scope or whether a discovery phase should resolve uncertainty first.
Check deliverables, assumptions, exclusions, responsibilities, dependencies, payment terms and acceptance conditions together.
A strong scope identifies the smallest coherent release, the features that can follow later and the decisions that could change the cost materially. This gives the project room to sparkle where it creates value without allowing every page, animation or integration to become a separate surprise.
Fund the actions and information people need most before expanding edge cases.
Invest in components and content structures that can support several related pages or workflows.
Test complex interaction or integration assumptions before committing the entire build.
Keep later phases connected to the architecture while making each approved release useful on its own.
Each route answers a different operating question while retaining the same standards for evidence, responsibility and a usable next step.
Questions worth resolving
Request a scoped estimate
We can then identify whether the next useful step is a defined proposal, a discovery phase or a smaller first release.